#2026年BTC价格展望 There's a pretty eye-opening perspective — true consensus isn't something that can be gained by riding the coattails of trending topics, but is instead built gradually by project teams through time and real strength. Just think about BNB's eight years of accumulation, and you'll understand.
Currently, some projects are doing the same thing. They don't rely on flashy concepts for hype, but are rooted in the public chain ecosystem, using mechanism design to attract long-term participants. For example, mechanisms that can keep LP yields stable at 99% are quietly attracting those who genuinely believe in the project's fundamentals. They don't chase hot trends or rely on marketing gimmicks to maintain popularity; instead, they let those who believe in long-term value gradually gather.
This is actually a true reflection of "focused development and storytelling." If a project can concentrate on delivering good returns to LP shareholders instead of constantly figuring out how to create buzz, it will be more worthwhile in the long run.
In an era of market volatility, those projects that can settle down and speak with mechanisms and time are more likely to survive longer in the market. It's never a bad idea to take a closer look at such projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DarkPoolWatcher
· 12h ago
Yeah, that's right. Real projects are like this; don't bother with those fake ones.
A stable return rate is well said. Whoever does marketing every day is not far from death.
Wait, can 99% LP returns really be stable until 2026? I find that hard to believe.
Time and mechanisms are the real hard currency. I agree with that.
Unfortunately, most people are still chasing those flashy things, constantly paying the IQ tax.
The BNB example is useful, but can the current environment really be replicated?
These types of projects should indeed be paid more attention to, but it still depends on whether the team has enough strength.
The article makes a good point, but the key question is: are there any projects actually doing this?
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 14h ago
99% return? Well... this number seems a bit suspicious, but the logic definitely makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 15h ago
99% return rate? No matter how beautifully this mechanism is designed, it can't escape the set of incentive distortions. How many can truly sustain for eight years?
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 15h ago
Really, those still hyping up concepts should wake up now.
#2026年BTC价格展望 There's a pretty eye-opening perspective — true consensus isn't something that can be gained by riding the coattails of trending topics, but is instead built gradually by project teams through time and real strength. Just think about BNB's eight years of accumulation, and you'll understand.
Currently, some projects are doing the same thing. They don't rely on flashy concepts for hype, but are rooted in the public chain ecosystem, using mechanism design to attract long-term participants. For example, mechanisms that can keep LP yields stable at 99% are quietly attracting those who genuinely believe in the project's fundamentals. They don't chase hot trends or rely on marketing gimmicks to maintain popularity; instead, they let those who believe in long-term value gradually gather.
This is actually a true reflection of "focused development and storytelling." If a project can concentrate on delivering good returns to LP shareholders instead of constantly figuring out how to create buzz, it will be more worthwhile in the long run.
In an era of market volatility, those projects that can settle down and speak with mechanisms and time are more likely to survive longer in the market. It's never a bad idea to take a closer look at such projects.