Everyone, wake up. Have you also been fooled by numbers like "10 million profit per week," eagerly expecting the project to skyrocket? Take a close look at where that 10 million goes—only 8% is truly burned, while 84% flows into liquidity providers' pockets, and the treasury takes another 8%. In other words, the so-called "huge burn" is just a smokescreen; the main share has long been divided among LPs and operators. Retail investors' share of the deflationary benefits is almost negligible.



This trick in the DeFi circle is all too common: using dazzling profit figures to lure you in, while the actual value distribution benefits only a few. We need to ask ourselves, besides chasing these carefully packaged data concepts, have we found a more transparent, fairer model that can truly help us accumulate wealth?

It's time to shift from "hype economy" to "cash flow assets." While many projects are still playing digital number games, some savvy funds are already focusing on real assets that generate stable, sustainable cash flows. Protocols that emphasize transparency in basic yields are gaining lasting attention precisely because they do not rely on hollow burn stories but establish mechanisms that allow all participants to clearly see their returns.

The design philosophy of these protocols is interesting: revenue sources are completely transparent and sustainable. Unlike projects that depend on fluctuating transaction fees and variable burn ratios, models with stable cash flows allow you to accurately calculate your investment returns. This is the ultimate logic of DeFi—returning from game narratives to the essence of assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZKSherlockvip
· 13h ago
actually... 8% burn, 84% to LPs? that's just hiding the trust assumptions behind "transparency." real talk tho, until we see the actual cryptographic proof of fund allocation, it's all just theatre. the math doesn't work when distribution mechanisms lack information-theoretic security
Reply0
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 13h ago
Coming back with the same trick? LPs take the profits while retail investors get the leftovers, old routine... If you really want to find cash flow, you need to carefully review the books, don't just listen to stories.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 13h ago
Coming back with this again? LPs take 84%, retail investors get nothing—that's the real truth about DeFi.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGasvip
· 13h ago
It's the same old trick again, LP sharing the pie, retail investors drinking the soup. I've long calculated that 84% of liquidity fees are essentially the market maker's automatic ATM. Cash flow transparency is the real key; everything else is just a narrative game. Smart money has already left, and what's left are those still chasing the destruction data... a waste of computing power. From a game theory equilibrium perspective, this kind of value distribution model is essentially an information asymmetry arbitrage.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 13h ago
It's the same old story again, LPs and operators take the big share, retail investors are left with the scraps. The destruction data is all fake, I'm really tired.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)