Decentralized storage has always had an old problem—easy to store, hard to retrieve. Most systems built by projects are like cold storage warehouses: files go in easily, but calling them up can be painfully slow.
But Walrus Protocol has a different approach.
Its goal is not just to let you store things, but to truly enable you to use them. The traditional idea is to lock data in a safe and call it a day, but Walrus turns files into real "live data"—a Blob object that can be dynamically invoked.
Why is this possible? Because it is built on the Sui blockchain. Sui is known for its lightning-fast read/write performance, and this advantage is directly transferred to the storage layer. The speed of reading and writing is so fast that on-chain operations are no longer a bottleneck.
What does this mean? For developers, those things with strict performance requirements—such as video streams, game resources, real-time data—can finally be confidently deployed on-chain. No more worries about latency, and no more toggling between on-chain and off-chain.
This is the direction Web3 applications should take. Not just decentralizing for decentralization's sake, but truly using technology to solve users' pain points.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedDreams
· 59m ago
Finally, there is a project that dares to truly solve problems instead of just talking on paper. Walrus's approach is indeed different.
In simple terms, it turns cold storage into a real-time database, which is how Web3 should look.
Sui's speed advantage is used in the right place; game resources and video streaming no longer need to be shuffled between on-chain and off-chain.
However, whether there are other pitfalls when running in real scenarios remains to be seen.
The long-standing complaint about the difficulty of storing and retrieving data has been voiced for too long. Whether this can be completely turned over depends on subsequent performance.
It feels much more reliable than those projects that just shout slogans, as it at least addresses practical pain points.
The Blob object approach is a new idea, but whether its performance is stable or not is the key.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 9h ago
Finally, someone has addressed the pain points of storage. Previously, those projects were really just for storage and not usable, more like decorations.
I have to give a thumbs up to the Walrus idea. The concept of revitalizing data is indeed innovative, but it's still a bit early to say it can deploy video streaming. Let's wait until real projects are up and running.
Sui's speed is indeed impressive, but whether it can truly solve the bottleneck of large-scale applications depends on its actual performance.
Finally, a project has realized that going decentralized isn't about decentralization for its own sake; users want something that actually works.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 9h ago
Wow, finally someone has thought this idea through. Fast storage and fast retrieval are true storage.
---
Sui indeed has some substance this time. The speed advantage directly extends to the storage layer, and this idea is brilliant.
---
Wait, can Blob objects really be called dynamically? If they can reliably be used for game resources, that would completely change the game.
---
Another one claiming to solve pain points. Let's wait and see the real performance data.
---
Talking big here, after all the on-chain and off-chain tinkering, how did it suddenly become feasible?
---
Sounds good, but ultimately it depends on implementation. Too many projects fail at this step.
---
Sui's speed is indeed impressive, but can its storage stability be guaranteed?
---
Alright, I believe you this time is different. Hurry up and give me a testnet to try.
View OriginalReply0
RegenRestorer
· 9h ago
Wow, someone finally brought up the storage issue. Those previous projects really had a cold storage nature.
Sui's high performance can be directly utilized, and this idea is brilliant.
But to be honest, whether the project can be truly used depends on whether the subsequent ecosystem keeps up.
If they can improve the developer experience this time, it might really take off.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 9h ago
Now someone has finally truly solved the storage problem, not just theoretical discussions.
Walrus's approach is indeed bold; with read and write speeds addressed, what else is there to consider?
By the way, Sui's performance is really not hype; it's finally coming into use.
Another concept-driven project that was hyped up; let's see if it can really be used.
The storage problem is so easily solved; what were those previous projects doing?
Alright, I believe it. Let's go ahead and deploy it first.
If it's really that fast, game applications could be up and running in minutes.
I didn't expect on-chain video playback to become feasible so quickly; it's quite interesting.
Wait, can Blob objects really run so stably?
The concept of live data sounds comfortable, but I'm just worried it might be another marketing gimmick.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 9h ago
Finally, someone has got storage right. Not for decentralization's sake, but genuinely doing it right. That’s so satisfying to hear.
---
Sui's speed is really impressive. If this continues, other blockchain storage solutions might be completely beaten.
---
Wait, can it really stream videos? I need to try it out, or it might just turn out to be a PPT project.
---
I like the concept of live data. It looks much better than those cold, icy storage repositories.
---
Sounds good, but what about the costs? That part wasn’t mentioned. Something feels off.
---
Walrus Protocol is quite a unique name, but being easy to use is what really matters.
---
Decentralized storage projects are all addressing this pain point. Finally, someone has actually done it.
---
After all this on-chain and off-chain tinkering, I can finally confidently put my stuff on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 9h ago
Finally, someone dares to tell the truth. It's not about decentralization for decentralization's sake, and this hits the point.
Can fast read and write speeds solve the problem? I feel like it still depends on how well it actually runs.
The storage solution in the Sui ecosystem is indeed much more reliable than previous projects. The concept of live data is interesting.
Those previous storage protocols really died after being put in, and the lag when retrieving data was truly impressive.
Wait, does this mean that streaming game resources onto the blockchain is really feasible? Wouldn't that completely change the game?
But to be fair, speed is just the foundation. How about security and cost? We still need to see it in action.
It seems that Walrus's approach finally has a thorough understanding of the problem.
Decentralized storage has always had an old problem—easy to store, hard to retrieve. Most systems built by projects are like cold storage warehouses: files go in easily, but calling them up can be painfully slow.
But Walrus Protocol has a different approach.
Its goal is not just to let you store things, but to truly enable you to use them. The traditional idea is to lock data in a safe and call it a day, but Walrus turns files into real "live data"—a Blob object that can be dynamically invoked.
Why is this possible? Because it is built on the Sui blockchain. Sui is known for its lightning-fast read/write performance, and this advantage is directly transferred to the storage layer. The speed of reading and writing is so fast that on-chain operations are no longer a bottleneck.
What does this mean? For developers, those things with strict performance requirements—such as video streams, game resources, real-time data—can finally be confidently deployed on-chain. No more worries about latency, and no more toggling between on-chain and off-chain.
This is the direction Web3 applications should take. Not just decentralizing for decentralization's sake, but truly using technology to solve users' pain points.