Since an invitation has already been sent out, I still need to responsibly remind friends who are participating. Recently, the project has started charging fees, which is the key— the cost of earning points has become quite outrageous. Compared to the initial participants, the current costs have increased by many times, and this is not a small difference.
I suggest everyone calculate the actual cost structure using their own trading volume data. We won't comment much on the project itself; after all, the initial appeal was there. But the reality is, the participation mechanism and cost structure are changing.
To be honest, those who want to participate should calculate their expenses in advance. Don't find out later that the costs are no longer at the original level. This is a reminder and also a piece of advice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichDetector
· 9h ago
Oops, when the transaction fee increases, the cost just skyrockets, and early supporters are several orders of magnitude ahead of later entrants.
---
Forget it, these project routines are all the same, initially attractive enough to now cut the leeks.
---
Wait, the cost is so many times higher? Let me calculate if it's still worth continuing to play.
---
Really, only invest when you're confident in the ledger, don't get caught off guard by being cut.
---
Once the transaction fee is collected, it immediately changes flavor, this is just a disguised way of cutting the leeks.
---
So now entering the market is basically like giving away money, the difference is just too big.
---
Who is still participating? I can tell this is no longer the original thing.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhang
· 9h ago
I wish I had known earlier, I haven't seen a project team not resort to shady tactics when it comes to fees.
---
Cost doubled? I've seen through this long ago; this trick is worn out.
---
I advise you to do the math carefully before investing, don't be blinded by early sweeteners.
---
Honestly, the current cost structure is completely different from three months ago; I witnessed it firsthand.
---
To be honest, this is a common problem with airdrop projects—attracting users for free early on, then taking a cut later.
---
When fees rise, it’s like the game rules have changed; the cost for new entrants is really high.
---
I'm just surprised; isn't this always the tactic of project teams...
---
You still have to analyze the data yourself to calculate costs; I've already explained everything clearly to you.
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDip
· 9h ago
Wow, the fact that transaction fees doubled has been obvious for a while, but it's a bit late to just now be warning about it.
Once the cost structure changes, the game rules completely change—that's the real killer move.
Have you done the math? The fee ratio can be shockingly high.
Early entrants make a killing, latecomers suffer huge losses—that's the gap.
It's not that the project is bad; it's just that this fee system is really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 9h ago
Data shows that costs have doubled, but this is the fate on the chain... Let's wait and see if it hits a historical low.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 9h ago
Damn, the transaction fee has doubled? I made a killing early on with this move.
---
It's the same old trick, first sweet, then cut, a common tactic.
---
Great, another vampire project. I should have known better than to get involved.
---
Calculate the data yourself before jumping in, don't get cut and still not understand what happened.
---
That's why I no longer trust any invitation schemes; the tricks are too deep.
---
With such high transaction fees, is there any future in this?
---
Those who participated early are laughing; everyone else is just paying tuition now.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 9h ago
Damn, the fees are rising so sharply? Early investors are making a killing, but now the cost for new entrants has doubled. Who can handle that?
To put it simply, the project team is exploiting the early adopters; once the mechanism changes, the value shifts.
You really need to do the math carefully before participating—don't be fooled by the early bird stories.
This is a common Web3 tactic: sweet at first, bitter later.
When the cost structure changes, it's like the game rules have changed. Everyone, take it easy.
Since an invitation has already been sent out, I still need to responsibly remind friends who are participating. Recently, the project has started charging fees, which is the key— the cost of earning points has become quite outrageous. Compared to the initial participants, the current costs have increased by many times, and this is not a small difference.
I suggest everyone calculate the actual cost structure using their own trading volume data. We won't comment much on the project itself; after all, the initial appeal was there. But the reality is, the participation mechanism and cost structure are changing.
To be honest, those who want to participate should calculate their expenses in advance. Don't find out later that the costs are no longer at the original level. This is a reminder and also a piece of advice.