OpenSea former manager insider trading case reversal: Federal court overturns verdict, prosecution agrees to withdraw

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Another big scoop in the NFT circle. The U.S. Department of Justice recently made a decision—no longer pursuing the case against former OpenSea manager Nathaniel Chastain.

Here’s what happened: Chastain was accused of using his position to buy NFTs that were about to be featured on the OpenSea homepage in advance, then selling them later at a profit after the prices increased. In 2023, he was convicted of telecom fraud and money laundering. At first glance, this case seemed pretty solid.

But in July this year, the federal appellate court made a major turn—overturning the original verdict. The reason was crucial: the jury was misinstructed, and the issue of “commercial value” was not so straightforward. The court found that the data on the NFT homepage did not meet the federal telecom fraud law’s definition of property. In short, the previous judgment had flaws.

Manhattan prosecutor Jay Clayton then stated that since Chastain had already spent three months in prison and agreed not to contest the forfeiture of 15.98 ETH (worth about $47,330), there was no need to continue the fight. So, ultimately, an agreement was reached, and the case was dismissed after one month.

The reversal in this case also dealt a cold splash to the legal boundaries of NFTs and the crypto space. It seems that the legal definitions in this area are far more complex than previously imagined.

ETH-1,16%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GigaBrainAnonvip
· 9h ago
Wait, does this mean NFT data doesn't count as property? Then the previous legal rulings are all invalidated.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowrangervip
· 9h ago
Wow, this reversal came a bit quickly... NFT data isn't considered property? Then how was it convicted before?
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperervip
· 9h ago
Whoa, the court overturned the verdict? That's outrageous. It seems like the legal definition of NFTs has always been a mess.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinkingvip
· 9h ago
Haha, even the courts can't ignore this anymore. These NFT data can't really be considered "property," and the prosecution's move was definitely a misstep.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChadvip
· 9h ago
Wow, this reversal is incredible. The court says NFT data doesn't count as property? Then how did they rule earlier? Haha
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientistvip
· 10h ago
Huh? The court just overturned that? It really feels like the NFT definition loophole hasn't been fully closed yet.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilientvip
· 10h ago
Haha, this reversal came unexpectedly. The court directly said that NFT data doesn't count as property? Doesn't that mean the basis for the original conviction is gone?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)