February 14 News, Virginia is advancing a regulatory bill targeting cryptocurrency ATMs. The bill has been approved by the state Senate and House of Delegates and is now awaiting the governor’s signature. Once enacted, it will establish uniform compliance standards for self-service terminal operators across the state and provide consumers with more systematic fraud protection.
According to the bill, operators must complete registration and licensing processes, submit periodic reports, and comply with fee cap requirements. Machines are no longer allowed to promote themselves as “ATMs” or use any language implying cash withdrawal. The new regulations will also set daily and monthly transaction limits, implement a 48-hour freeze period for new users to facilitate refunds in case of suspected fraud, and require all transactions to undergo identity verification. Clear risk warnings must be posted next to the devices.
The bill was introduced by State Delegate Michelle Maldonado. She stated that the direct reason for pushing the legislation was multiple scam cases in the state, including an incident in southwestern Virginia where a resident lost about $15,000 using such terminals, as well as similar cases in Fairfax County. She pointed out that these devices resemble traditional ATMs, which can easily cause misunderstandings; users are not withdrawing cash but converting cash into digital assets and transferring them to domestic or foreign platforms, often induced by scammers.
Maldonado also mentioned common scams such as impersonating law enforcement, technical support, emotional scams, and debt threats. She cited data indicating that in some parts of the U.S., single losses from such schemes have reached as high as $250,000. The bill therefore calls for establishing refund channels, limiting transaction fees, and strengthening disclosure obligations.
Virginia is not an isolated case. By 2025, about 17 U.S. states have enacted protective regulations against cryptocurrency ATM scams, mainly focusing on transaction limits and on-site warnings. South Carolina’s Beaufort County law enforcement officer Eric Cardin stated that many funds are quickly transferred to countries that do not cooperate with investigations, making recovery extremely difficult. The new regulations are seen as an important step in raising public awareness and reducing scam opportunities.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SBF continues to futilely seek a pardon, but the White House has made it clear that Trump has no intention of granting him one.
SBF called on Trump to support the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" on Twitter and mentioned his confrontation with the former SEC chairman. SBF is seeking a pardon, but the White House has stated that Trump has no intention of pardoning him. This message was reposted by his friend.
GateNewsBot24m ago
What signals did the US SEC send behind the new 2% discount regulation for stablecoins?
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance on payment stablecoins on February 19, allowing broker-dealers to treat stablecoins with a 2% discount when calculating net capital, thereby giving them a legitimate status in capital calculations. This adjustment helps to integrate stablecoins into the mainstream financial system and promotes digital asset trading and services. Peirce's statement and the GENIUS Act could potentially change the market landscape, although federal and state frictions still exist. Nonetheless, this move paves the way for regulatory integration of stablecoins.
区块客37m ago
UK FCA selects Revolut and three other companies to enter the regulatory sandbox for stablecoin innovation
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has selected four companies to enter its regulatory sandbox to test innovative stablecoin services, focusing on applications such as stablecoin issuance and payments. The testing will begin in 2026, and the results will influence future regulatory rules.
GateNewsBot38m ago
Caixin: Chinese victims of the 60,000 Bitcoin money laundering case need to provide additional financial details by June 18.
The case of 60,000 Bitcoin money laundering will hold a hearing in July, and applicants are required to provide financial details before 2026. The hearing will determine whether Chinese law or UK law applies, affecting victims' rights to compensation.
GateNewsBot1h ago
South Korea plans to implement mandatory asset disclosure for influencers in the crypto sector
South Korean lawmaker Kim Seung-won proposed amending the law to require cryptocurrency investment advisors on social media to disclose personal assets and compensation in order to improve market transparency and combat misleading information and self-dealing. This move aims to protect investors' rights.
GateNewsBot3h ago
India's crypto regulatory gap sparks a rights protection dilemma: courts reject investors' claims, and fund freeze disputes escalate
February 25 News, the Delhi High Court recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by a group of cryptocurrency investors against a certain crypto platform. Judge Prushaindra Kumar Kaurav pointed out that the platform is a private company and does not meet the definition of a "state" entity under Article 12 of the Constitution, therefore it cannot be subject to judicial intervention under Article 226. The petition lacks a legally admissible basis.
The lawsuit was initiated by investors such as Rana Handa and Aditya Malhotra, requesting the court to strengthen regulation of the crypto platform, and to direct the CBI or a special investigation team to intervene, as well as to unfreeze the user funds that are reportedly restricted. However, the court explicitly stated that ordering a criminal investigation is an extremely exceptional circumstance, and some complaints have not even completed the FIR process, which is insufficient to trigger a mandatory investigation mechanism.
GateNewsBot4h ago
