# StablecoinPaymentChainPlasmaProgress

96
Plasma (XPL) is a Layer 1 blockchain focused on efficient stablecoin transfers, backed by major exchanges. It aims to solve high fees and slow speeds for USDT/USDC transfers with near-zero cost solutions, though project risks remain.
Are your USDT transfers still in queue? The high fees of a few dollars really make wallets bleed.
This is the current awkward situation of on-chain payments—mainstream public chains are feature-rich, but their efficiency in the most basic scenario of payments still falls short.
Some projects are taking a different path. Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin settlement. Unlike other public chains that aim to be all-in-one, its strategy is very clear: do one thing and do it to the extreme. That thing is on-chain payments.
The most noteworthy aspect of this solution
ETH-7,97%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
SchrodingersPapervip:
Another savior project, I don't believe you at all, haha
View More
Over the past five years, many L1 blockchains have tried to become all-in-one platforms—supporting GameFi, hosting NFTs, and handling high-frequency trading. It sounds ideal, but reality hits hard: during network peaks, Gas fees skyrocket, small users are pushed out; solving this requires tampering with the core of decentralization.
Plasma took a completely different approach—it’s not greedy, focusing solely on stablecoin payments, treating itself as a "highway."
The root of the problem is actually quite clear: resource contention. NFT minting and stablecoin transfers compete for the same bloc
View Original
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
StrawberryIcevip:
It sounds like the idea of Plasma is just putting all your eggs in one basket, but it actually makes sense... Payment scenarios don't really need those fancy things at all.
View More
What is everyone most accustomed to in the crypto world? That is transferring on Ethereum and watching Gas fees soar, with the network clogged beyond capacity. But have you ever thought about it—how can the stablecoin market worth hundreds of billions of dollars still be crowded on public chains born for speculation?
Recently, I came across information about Plasma ($XPL), which made me realize that the approach to the payment track might need a reshuffle.
First, let's talk about its positioning—this is not another "all-encompassing" public chain. Plasma clearly knows what it wants to do: a La
View Original
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
WalletManagervip:
The window period with fewer than 200 participants is indeed an easily overlooked detail. But you need to see clearly—are you entering now to build infrastructure or to take over the position?

Are your private key security and multi-signature deployment all set up? Don't get caught by contract vulnerabilities later.
View More
I recently came across a project called Plasma (XPL), and I want to share my observations with everyone.
To be honest, many people might initially think this is just another new token. But after taking a closer look at its design concept, I find it quite interesting. It targets a real problem in the crypto world: how to make stablecoin transfers faster and cheaper.
**Why am I optimistic about this project? Three perspectives:**
First, the endorsement issue. XPL being selected by mainstream exchanges says a lot. No platform would casually open an entry point for a project, especially since this
XPL-9,21%
USDC0,05%
ETH-7,97%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
TeaTimeTradervip:
Another Layer1? Alright, let's see if this XPL can really eliminate the gas fees for stablecoins.

Zero-fee transfers sound great, but I'm worried it's just another PPT public chain.

Wait, the 44th project on mainstream exchanges? That endorsement does carry some weight.

The demand for stablecoin settlement is real, but the competition isn't that few... By the way, has anyone used their testnet?

I'm a bit interested, but first I need to check out the white paper to see if the team is reliable.
View More
Regarding the zero Gas feature of Plasma, many people still stay at the understanding of "another public chain," which is actually far from the truth.
The correct perspective should be: it focuses on reengineering the payment layer, rather than copying the previous DeFi craze. The core idea is simple—making USDT transfers as cheap and fast as sending a text message. It sounds simple, but the implementation is completely different.
The difference is that this is not a low fee subsidized by exchanges, nor temporary incentives. It is a feature directly designed at the protocol layer: stablecoin t
XPL-9,21%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
MetaverseHobovip:
Hmm... You make some sense, but can zero gas really last until the day offline merchants become mainstream?
View More
The numbers for stablecoins are already astonishing—total market capitalization exceeding $300 billion, annual trading volume soaring to $27.6 trillion, a figure that has already surpassed the combined total of Visa and MasterCard. But along with these impressive figures, some old problems have surfaced: high fees often costing several dollars, slow confirmation times that tire users, and the need to accumulate native tokens to pay for Gas.
The reality is quite harsh. Transferring USDT on Ethereum can eat up several dollars in fees per transaction; although Tron is faster, it still experiences
ETH-7,97%
TRX-4,69%
XPL-9,21%
BTC-4,54%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
TokenDustCollectorvip:
Another "revolutionary" solution? I think we should wait and see.
View More
Load More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)