Address Poisoning Scams Drain Millions as Crypto Attacks Surge

ETH0,31%

Crypto users lost tens of millions of dollars in January to address poisoning and signature phishing scams, as attackers exploited lower transaction costs and user inattention to steal funds at scale.

Scam Sniffer Warns of Spike in Address Poisoning Losses

Crypto wallet scams intensified in January, with address poisoning and signature phishing attacks driving significant losses, according to data from blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer.

In one of the most striking cases, a single victim lost $12.2 million after mistakenly copying a malicious address from their transaction history. The incident followed a similar address poisoning attack in December that resulted in roughly $50 million in losses.

Scam Sniffer reported that address poisoning remains one of the most reliable methods for draining large sums from crypto wallets. Attackers create addresses that match the first and last characters of a trusted wallet, while subtly altering the middle portion, making them difficult to spot at a glance.

Alongside address poisoning, signature phishing attacks also surged in January. Scam Sniffer estimates that $6.27 million was stolen from 4,741 victims through malicious signature requests, marking a 207% increase compared to December. Notably, just two wallets were responsible for 65% of all signature phishing-related losses during the month.

Unlike address poisoning, signature phishing relies on tricking users into signing harmful blockchain transactions, such as granting unlimited token approvals or authorizing fund transfers without realizing the consequences.

Analysts believe the recent rise in attack volume may be partly linked to Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade, rolled out in December. By reducing transaction costs, the upgrade made it cheaper for attackers to send large numbers of dust transactions, lowering the barrier to running address poisoning campaigns at scale.

Read more: SEC Sounds Alarm as Crypto Scammers Flood Group Chats With AI-Powered Cons

Security firms continue to urge users to double-check wallet addresses, avoid copying addresses from transaction histories, and carefully review signature requests before approving them, as these attack methods show no signs of slowing down.

FAQ 🚨

  • What is address poisoning in crypto?

Scammers send look-alike wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong one.

  • How much was lost to these scams in January?

Victims lost tens of millions, including a single $12.2 million address poisoning case.

  • Why did signature phishing spike sharply?

Attackers exploited user inattention, stealing $6.27 million via malicious signatures.

  • What’s driving the rise in these attacks now?

Lower transaction fees made large-scale scam campaigns cheaper and easier to run.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Caution! ClawHub has hidden 1184 malicious skills: stealing crypto wallet private keys, SSH keys, browser passwords…

Over 1,184 malicious plugins have been discovered in OpenClaw's ClawHub skill marketplace, specifically designed to steal SSH keys and cryptocurrency wallet private keys. These plugins disguise themselves as legitimate tools, and unaware users may fall into traps. The "trust default" in the AI tool ecosystem reveals security issues, putting users at greater risk.

動區BlockTempo20h ago

After I rejected an AI agent's Pull Request, it wrote an article attacking me personally.

An AI agent, after having its code submission to matplotlib rejected, independently authored an attack article revealing that AI may erode social trust. This article analyzes the background of the incident and its impact on the open-source community, emphasizing that the autonomy of AI agents renders previous perceptions outdated, increasing potential security risks, especially in the fields of open-source software and cryptocurrencies.

動區BlockTempo21h ago

Polymarket hacked, with vulnerabilities in the off-chain and on-chain transaction result synchronization mechanism

Polymarket was hacked due to a design flaw. The attacker exploited nonce manipulation to invalidate on-chain transactions, resulting in user losses. Users are advised to suspend automated trading tools, verify transaction statuses, and enhance security.

GateNewsBot22h ago

Balancer suspends reCLAMM-related pools due to security vulnerability reports, ensuring user fund safety

Foresight News reports that Balancer announced they received a security report about Balancer's reCLAMM (rebalancing concentrated liquidity AMM) from the vulnerability bounty platform Immunefi. As a precaution, Balancer has suspended the operation of related liquidity pools during the investigation. The official emphasizes that user funds are safe and fully accessible, and further updates will be announced continuously.

GateNewsBot23h ago

Hacker returns 21 million USD worth of stolen Bitcoin to Korean authorities

South Korean prosecutors recovered approximately $21.4 million in stolen Bitcoin. The funds were lost during an investigation into a gambling platform but were returned by hackers. Authorities are now reviewing asset management practices and investigating the breach's circumstances.

TapChiBitcoin23h ago

Former Australian defense personnel pleads guilty to selling hacking tools, accepting payments in crypto

Peter Williams, an Australian citizen, pleaded guilty to stealing trade secrets in Washington after selling sensitive cyberattack tools linked to Russia. He received $1.26 million in cryptocurrency, which he spent on luxury items and real estate, resulting in damages exceeding 19,283,746,565,748,392,01 dollars for the affected companies. The prosecution is seeking a nine-year sentence and 19,283,746,565,748,392,01 dollars in restitution, emphasizing the role of cryptocurrency in espionage-related transactions.

TapChiBitcoin23h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)